I just read a book
called Gospel of the Living Dead,
in which theologian Kim Paffenroth analyzes five great zombie movies
(Night of the Living Dead,
Dawn of the Dead 1978,
Day of the Dead, Dawn
of the Dead 2004, and Land
of the Dead) from a Christian
perspective. Though he stops short of making this explicit,
Paffenroth traces a through-narrative of the four Romero films that
pretty clearly mirrors the trajectory of Jesus' death and
resurrection.
A
crucial theme of Romero's first four Dead films,
and something very few of his disciples have ever picked up on, is
the development of the zombies. Night of the Living Dead
presents the ghouls as nothing
more than the mindless flesh-eaters we all know and fantasize about
shooting; Dawn begins
to hint that there is something more to them than just the
cannibalistic instinct; Day portrays
a zombie beginning to develop rudimentary skills and basic emotional
ties; and by Land of the Dead the
zombies have their own more or less functional city alongside the
humans. Paffenroth reads the movies as increasingly optimistic,
traveling from the utter bleakness of Night's
wonderfully nihilistic ending to a degree of hopefulness for
human/zombie coexistence by the end of Land.
This
also is pretty much how I read the crucifixion and resurrection.
Consider:
the death and descent of the zombie uprising, with all the
hellishness that entails, is the very thing that undoes
materialistic, capitalistic, kyriarchal society – Romero is famous
for his fierce social critique, and Paffenroth does a fine job of
unpacking the films' criticisms of racism, sexism, class inequality,
rampant consumerism, and so on – and ultimately allows for the
rebuilding of a better world. Now this could be read in the
traditionally eschatological way (there's a reason we call it zombie
apocalypse), but I
prefer a non-eschatological theology that sees this death-and-resurrection narrative as the
narrative of the daily taking up of the cross.
Redemption
only comes through the utmost suffering. The zombies, like all of
society, must lose their souls in order to regain them. They die to
self in order to be reborn as a new community. Only by losing our
lives can we gain life; only by dying could Jesus defeat death.
Compare
Mark C. Taylor's Erring,
a “postmodern a/theology” which declares the post-Hegel world to
be a world without God, self, history, or book. These four concepts
are dead, and something new must be built in their place –
something radically new: an erring, mazing, de/constructive,
relational freeplay that does not resort to oversimplifications or
hierarchized oppositions. Something, in fact, rather like
human/zombie coexistence.
I've
never understood why Nietzsche's “God is dead” pronouncement
shocked anyone. I mean, what do Christians believe happened on the
cross? Isn't the crucifixion really the moment that kills God, self,
history, and book; that kills the transcendental signified, the
ultimate referent, the Logos? And isn't it only by this death that it
can rise again, new and different and wonderfully strange?
No comments:
Post a Comment